The lighting was poor and the course was very hard to follow.
The wedding was over pretty quick, but the party/reception was still going on when I left about 3am, but it was breaking up a bit after about 1:00am, around the time the first run group was starting timed runs. Until then, during practice, after you finished your run, you had to thread your way thru the west end of the parking lot full of wedding party-goers, parking their cars and coming and going all night, in order to get in line to stage for your next run. At the worst of it, they had some parking attendants directing traffic, but it was a zoo in the staging/pre-grid area.Brad Roberts wrote:A wedding until 2am?
I have run on some small lots that were fun, but trying to fit too much into a small area gets dangerous. Having traffic going and coming with little separation of lanes on the course, combined with hard objects (curbs, chain link fences and concrete block walls) defining the edge of the course takes some of the fun out of it for me. Add to this the difficulty of seeing a poorly defined course under nightime driving conditions and I was amazed that there were no wrecks.We traveled up north for the seat time. The sites didnt really matter. Run a Redwood Region Zone7 event some time..LOL it is done on a postage stamp, but the fun factor is still way UP.
Well, yeah, if you actually followed the course it was the same. I saw many inexperienced people going 4 wheels off in between cones, cutting off a corner, and then back on course between two other cones and thinking they were OK. The cone spacing was such that it looked like there were gates everywhere. There were no pointer cones or walled cones to define the turns, and an attempt was made after the first practice session to draw a chalk line down the middle of the course to define it for those who were lost, but after dark, that line was hardly visible. Some people never "got it" and cut the same corners all night, from what I saw. I don't remember seeing anyone scored as DNF, but given the lack of course workers, and their inability to see things in the glare of headlights coming at them, it's not surprising. I think some cones stayed down throughout a session, as no one could see they were knocked over, much less tell who hit them! If you are trying to compete seriously under these conditions, it's a joke. The two hours it took for everyone to get thru registration and tech didn't lend itself to a lot of seat time, either, when combined with stopping the event every 20 minutes for at least 10 minutes while one group filed off to the pits and the next group filed on.But, this was the same for everyone correct?
The surface was fine--dead flat and level and smooth--no problem there.What about the surface? It cannot be any worse than Qualcomeapart.
If Jim Burke is still doing this for Riverside region, that is definitely true. He is sort of a one-man show for their autox program and is spread very thin. I'm sure he would be very happy to have any capable help he can get to put on the event. We are indeed very lucky to have such a deep corps of experienced volunteer workers here in SDR, and such a great venue as Qualcomm. Our procedures have been examined, developed and refined over many years of putting on high-attendance events to help "smooth them out." When you go elsewhere in the Zone, it is easy to see the difference in the organization and the pool of experience in the smaller regions.Brad Roberts wrote:It sounds to me like the organizer doesnt have a ton of help or experience like you have here in SD.
Neil told me today that they ran in a different lot than last year, which was a big improvement. He was pretty pumped about his TTOD/N!Jad wrote:According to my dad, this event wasn't too bad.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests