gah your 993 makes me want to spend more money on another car
Hmmmm do I really need a 944 for autocross?
kary wrote:I liked the original configuration also. I know we only drove the new portion of track at slow speeds but it did not seem all that interesting to me compared to the orginal track. Does any one know who designed the new portion of the track? It did not feel like Ruppert (the orginal owner and designer of the track) desgined it.
jack miller wrote:kary wrote:I liked the original configuration also. I know we only drove the new portion of track at slow speeds but it did not seem all that interesting to me compared to the orginal track. Does any one know who designed the new portion of the track? It did not feel like Ruppert (the orginal owner and designer of the track) desgined it.
To all who expressed their appreciation, you are very welcome. For next year, I'd like to get some names of volunteers to help with equipment transportation, timing, and towing (at BW and SM). I'm also conversing with Z7 about doing a TT at their event early June at the Vegas Motorspeedway. I'll post other dates as I get them.
Kary, I think the back section is a nice addition. I would have made the banked corner faster, but I liked the first off-camber hair pin and I love that zero gravity drop and the blind sweeper following it. I also did a fast blast onto the "fastest" configuration entering old track at 5B. I think you will like that a lot! Personally, I think that will be the way to go next year.
kary wrote:I liked the original configuration also. I know we only drove the new portion of track at slow speeds but it did not seem all that interesting to me compared to the orginal track. Does any one know who designed the new portion of the track? It did not feel like Ruppert (the orginal owner and designer of the track) desgined it.
Looks like Dan figured a couple more things out on his 3rd visit to the track. A 1:50.8 is pretty quick for an old geezer. Another couple of tenths and you could have had my AM-class track record, Dan! Too bad!Red Rooster wrote: Big Congrats go to my class nemisis Dan Andrews for his AM victory.
ttweed wrote:Kary-
Something funny happens when I hit the "flip time format" button on those results. The times over 120 seconds seem to be missing a "0" after the "2" and are a little hard to read correctly. Is that a bug in the conversion program?
TT
ttweed wrote: Looks like Dan figured a couple more things out on his 3rd visit to the track. A 1:50.8 is pretty quick for an old geezer. Another couple of tenths and you could have had my AM-class track record, Dan! Too bad!
TT
gulf911 wrote:ttweed wrote: Looks like Dan figured a couple more things out on his 3rd visit to the track. A 1:50.8 is pretty quick for an old geezer. Another couple of tenths and you could have had my AM-class track record, Dan! Too bad!
TT
Yeah Tom, I figured out you can't get a good time with a 1973 suspension.... and I also figured out you can't compete with 60" wings when you have a Duck Tail... With cantilevers or slicks I may have been knocking on Kary's door...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 262 guests