Ted Myrus wrote:Tom,
Wasn't that 1965 ?
Those are two VERY different cars. The '89 Speedster was a limited edition of 2,065 examples. Of this total production run, only 823 arrived in North America. They were nearly $100K new and have depreciated to the $45-50K level where they have leveled off. If it is in perfect, original condition, it may well keep its value for some collector IF YOU DON"T DRIVE IT MUCH! But what's the point in that? Unless you are looking for an original, classic Porsche to show or only drive on sunny Sundays, I would be very hesitant. If the mileage is as low as you say (10K), it has had less than 750 miles per YEAR put on it. That is hardly enough to have brought it up to operating temp once every week or two, which is pretty much essential to maintaining the mechanicals, fluids, seals, etc. If it was stored for a long period of time, that can be very hard on the car's mechanical systems as well, unless it was done correctly. I would be very careful about inspecting the car for any maintenance/repair needs, leaks, etc. before plunking down my hard-earned cash on it.speedee wrote:I'm just confuse between a classic 89 Speedster and a 2001 996 Turbo. Price is compatible, but two diffrent looks and performance. Will the 89 Speedster hold it value in the $50K for low mile of 10K?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 263 guests