sf.in.sd wrote:Almost a new topic now, but I am not sure if there is that much difference between Nanny on and off (* or as off as it can get) unless driver makes close to zero mistakes, as the computers (esp. in the 991) are really good.
The engineering itself is eliminating a lot of the usual differences in skill that would show up between drivers of various levels. 2nd hand info from Peter Busalacchi (Peter please correct)- is that older GT3's had a bigger difference between average and advanced drivers in terms of lap times. Something like several seconds at a track like Fontana. His assessment was it was down to <a few seconds between drivers with the 991, due to how well the car performs more or less by itself.
Shawn
Mike wrote:When I’m 70, 10 years from now driving a gt3 to the track and home without a truck or car trailer would be great.
...half the concern on track would be expensive fast car with no roll cage or onboard fire system.
gulf911 wrote:I have owned and tracked a 944 , 911E , 911 Track car and now GT4. Jad would say , yeah , but not very well....
gulf911 wrote:""Nanny cars" fail to communicate to the driver via hand and butt inputs what's going on with the car-to-surface interface."
Then you havent 'driven' a GT car. It is easily felt when it starts to slide and the right or left rear is being braked or throttle under PSM.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], halfmonkey and 62 guests