RickK wrote:David J Marguglio wrote:As long as we see fit to splice hairs, will those "base" cars with higher weight (i.e. cab tops, massaging seats, GPS, etc.) get to subtract points? It seems only fair, I mean if you put Jad's kid in a 964 cab and Steve's kid in a base 964, it seems only reasonable that the kid in the cab would get more sun, but would ulitimately be slower. Let's hear from Rick on this one.
Are you saying the lower center of gravity from the
lightweight top doesn't make up for the weight penalty?
Seriously, I would be in favor of setting the base weight of a model for a class at the weight of the heaviest variation offered. Would this be a C4 Cab, maybe?
I don't think the heaviest could be base weight. As approximates, the cab adds 150 lbs, the C4 about 100 lbs, a tip would be another 120 lbs, and maybe 100 lbs in stereo, pwr seats etc and you are 470 lbs above base, which is 20 points or so in weight reduction on a RSA.
I think you start with the base car, like a C2 coupe factory weight and add or subtract from that weight. RSA's take a few points, C4 Cab tips lose points. I think this should especially apply to SS class, with the caviets already listed in SS of no race tires etc. I also tend to think the weight should be when the car crosses the finish line, not with a full tank of gas that no one competes with. To allow for gas, spare and floor mat removal, 100 lbs under stock weight seems about right.
PS, Sorry TT, forgot you did mention the weight thing last year, but of course, there is still a conspiracy