Pete Millikin wrote:Final Q for the event master/meister - Say a boxster owner shows up that will run in s or ss class. I thought under the novice rule they can run regular belts (not five points) but must have arm restraints.
I think this is one area where the rules are a little too strict for the DE events at the Q. For big tracks it's probably necessary, but for the QDE's, I think the arm restraint requirement for open cars should be waived for the novice drivers in SS and S class, along with the 5-point harnesses. Like Steve says, without the 5-points, the arm restraints can't be anchored easily, so a new Boxster or cab owner is automatically required to install harness to run, and can't take advantage of the 2-event waiver. I think this ought to be up to the event master.Steve Grosekemper wrote:The only way a Boxster could run w/o 5-points is if the event master and/or tech inspector pass the arm restraint installation. (not likely)
I can't agree with that, James. The DEs at Qualcomm do not reach anywhere near the speeds of events at the big tracks, and the uniform, paved runoff is much better if someone loses it, given a well laid out track (avoiding the light poles and curbing/fences.) There are all kinds of obstacles at a big track--tire walls, hills, gullies, rocks, concrete barriers, Armco, etc., and soft, slippery stuff for your wheels to slide on or dig into if you run off the paving. Putting two wheels off into the dirt in a high-speed corner can more easily result in a loss of control due to the difference in traction on one side of the car than the other, whereas at the stadium, you run wide in a corner and you mow some cones.JamesWilson wrote:DE's, even those at the stadium, offer just as much risk and danger to those on a big track
kary wrote:At any rate the other reason I stopped running at the Q are the brakes and engine cooling. There is not enough time to get any air on the brakes, nor the engine. Brakes are the bigger issue in my mind. So I decided it simply was not worth the risk. Big tracks for me where the surface is known, consistent, and room to pass is plentiful as compared to the Q.
ttweed wrote:The tracks we lay out at the Q are simple and fully visible, with no blind corners as you experience at some tracks. They are much less challenging to drive and easier to learn. In reality, the DEs at the Q are just an autox with traffic and continuous laps, less turning, and a slightly longer straightaway or two. It is a perfect stepping stone to a big track DE and much safer, IMHO. I think our DE rules should reflect that difference. I'm not saying "lets run with no helmets or seatbelts," I'm saying that arm restraints are probably not necessary for novices in S and SS class at the QDEs, especially since they require race harnesses to work correctly, and we have waived that requirement in those classes for beginners. It doesn't make sense to me. I think it's overkill. But Gary has spoken, and he's the event master, so anyone looking to run a Boxster or Cab should be planning on bringing arm restraints.
TT
Dan Chambers wrote:Some folks on the forum have commented on how hard the QDE's are on their cars, yet some of them haven't been to a QDE in years. I believe we owe it to the Chairs that put on the QDE's a measure of confidence and credit for realizing the conditions that needed change, and then implementing them. The QDE's of today are, in my opinion, far different from the first one I drove in 2002. If you haven't driven a QDE lately, you don't know what you're missing. Come down and see what I'm talking about.
Hats off to the AX/QDE Team!
See you all on the 13th!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 175 guests