LUCKY DAVE wrote:At any forseeable service temps, filling race car tires with nitrogen is silly, the difference is too small to measure.
Like many "wives tales" (which I feel is a colloquialism that is a bit demeaning to the intelligence of women), I believe there is a kernal of scientific truth behind it. If you use
dry air to fill the tires, I would agree--the differences would be negligible. The problem is, as Jad mentioned, the amount of water that most common compressed air sources put into the tire along with the air. Pure, bottled nitrogen is a very dry gas. The humidity in air as it is compressed results in liquid water condensing in the compressor storage vessel, and unless a well-maintained, industrial-strength drying unit is used, some of this is transferred to your tires when you fill them with compressed air.
From what I understand, it is the phase change of this liquid water which causes greater pressure increases in the tire compared to a dry gas like nitrogen when a wheel is heated to racing temps. I do know that the volume of liquid water expands by a factor of 1700 when vaporized into steam, as this is the principle by which steam engines operate. Having never measured temps inside a hot tire, I can't say for sure how hot the air gets, but if the outside carcass is 220F, wouldn't it be very possible that some of the water inside has heated to beyond its 212F boiling point?
Like Jad, I have never bothered to utilize nitrogen in my tires due to the logistical problems involved, but many modern race teams do, in order to make pressure gains more predictable. To eliminate water from the tire would require purging it at least twice when filling with nitrogen, and would require that a non-water-based tire bead lubricant be used when mounting the tire, or the leftover water from the lubricant trapped inside the tire would defeat your nitrogen fill anyway. When I watch my tire guys swab the bead with a big brush of water-based lubricant, I realize that it is probably a lost cause for me to use nitrogen.
Outside of the auto racing sphere, the benefits of nitrogen filling regarding long-term maintenance of tires and wheels was indeed first recognized in aviation, where tires must operate in more extreme temperature and pressure conditions than automobiles, and where performance is more critical, but it has spread to trucking fleet maintenance and now is as common as your local Costco. The inhibition of oxidation of the tire and wheel material is one factor, but the migration of nitrogen through the rubber membrane of the tire is another. I believe there is evidence that nitrogen migrates out of the tire at a rate 3 to 4 times less than oxygen, due to the larger molecular size, but since air is only 21% O2, the actual pressure loss is probably less than twice as much over time. Nevertheless, it seems that fleet owners have recognized enough savings in tire maintenace and fuel costs over the long run to justify using nitrogen fills.
I am not a tire engineer, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once.
YMMV,
TT