rshon wrote:Here is the guideline embedded in the Car Classification webpage. It's a little different:
"The half points option only applies to factory options that were available for the model series of the car. Putting a factory 911 sway bar on a 914 will incur 30 points, not 15, however the 924S is in the 944 series, so it can upgrade to a 944 bar for 15, not 30."
If it is true that all the revised proposals for 2012 that were forwarded to the Zone 8 presidents were approved, as Tom B. said earlier in the "2012 Car Classification" thread, then this example language is now obsolete and needs to be revised on the car classification site. The new proposal was:
Non-stock sway bars Non-adjustable (non-stock factory or aftermarket) 15
Adjustable 30
The proposal contended that adjustability was the primary advantage of sway bars (for tuning to different track conditions) and needed to be penalized greater than fixed bars, factory or aftermarket. A non-stock or aftermarket bar that is non-adjustable takes only 15. As long as the 911 sway bar that was put on the 914 in the example above is non-adjustable, it would incur only 15 points, not 30. It does not have to conform to the model series chart--in this case, that is only for determining if the bar is a 0-point upgrade, which it can only be if it was available in the applicable model series.
Tom B. can correct me if I am wrong in this interpretation of the latest proposal that was approved, but this
does represent a fundamental change from the rule used in previous years, and even from the original 2012 rules that were published tentatively in 2010 and used in our 2011 TT series last year.
It seems to me that under this latest revised rule, Mark can use ANY non-adjustable bar that will fit his car for only 15 points, whether it comes from a 944 or even the aftermarket. If he chooses one from the 924S model series, it will be 0 points. If it is non-stock
and adjustable (such as the 968 M030 rear bar Steve mentions above), it is 30 points.
TT