Who's going to streets, and when are you leaving?

A place to hang out and discuss all things Porsche.

Postby Pete Millikin on Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:31 pm

I live in Escondido and I have tried the 15N> 57N >210>14 route twice, typically leaving SD about 1-2. I figured all freeway route might be faster even if it deals with east LA traffic. Even if the southern portion is clear (not often) I found the 14 sucks. It has been bumper to bumper nearly the whole way each time during 4-6PM.

I know my travel time is mostly prime time but I'm going back to the 15 to 138 route.
86 Carrera 3.2L #178
User avatar
Pete Millikin
Time Trialer
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 8:59 pm
Location: Escondido, CA

Postby Dan Chambers on Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:50 am

MikeD wrote:Since I start out on I-5 side of the county, I usually take 5 to the 57, to 210 to 14. About the only trouble spot I ever see here is the 57/60 junction. Other than that's it been pretty clear sailing all the way. A lot of the time there is a problem on the 5 going up the mountain, if this happens the 5/405 junction can suck major. Being on the 210 at this point can save 1 hour or more. (And... yes, I have sat in an hour plus traffic at the 5/405 merge, to then look in my mirriors and see no one on the 210 :evil: )

Some people prefer 5 -> 605 -> 210 -> 14. But everytime I try that the traffic from Fullerton to the 605 junction bites. So I get off the 5 earlier.

John Payne will swear up and down that the 405 is always good. But 9 out of 10 times I've taken the 405 to get through L.A. it sucks!

My $0.02


Mike:

Does that route (57, 210, 14) go as far as, or through, Pasadena? If so, does it jam up in Pasadena? I've never thought of that route before... sounds interesting. I've hit major traffic in Pasadena, but usually during rush hours in AM and PM. Just curious.....
Dan Chambers
"It's just a "well prepared" street car ... or a very, very well-mannered track car." :burnout:
1983 SC #91 3.6L, "Black Pearl" Livery
1987 944 (gone but not forgotten)
User avatar
Dan Chambers
Pro Racer
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego

Postby Pete Millikin on Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:22 am

Dan -
I'll give you my thoughts on the 210. Yes it goes through Pasadena and in my experience it has been busy at the South end but not totally backed up.
86 Carrera 3.2L #178
User avatar
Pete Millikin
Time Trialer
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 8:59 pm
Location: Escondido, CA

Postby MikeD on Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:38 am

Oops, sorry Dan, did not mean to ignore your question. So yeah, what Pete said. There is a little slow traffic in Pasadena right where you have to get off the 210 to stay on the 210 (Yeah, I hate L.A. freeway intersections too).
Mike Dougherty
'02 986 S - Arctic Silver/Black - #757 -- gone but not forgotten
User avatar
MikeD
Club Racer
 
Posts: 777
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: Davidson, NC

Postby mnettles on Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:53 pm

I take 5 to 605 to 210 to 14. No crazy interchanges, pretty easy driving. The only bad part is about 7 miles on the 605 before the 10 interchange. The 5 to 57 to 210 to 14 route works too but it's a bit longer and I haven't seen any improvement in travel time.
mnettles
Autocrosser
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:50 am

Postby JHPGT3 on Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:57 pm

MikeD wrote:Since I start out on I-5 side of the county, I usually take 5 to the 57, to 210 to 14. About the only trouble spot I ever see here is the 57/60 junction. Other than that's it been pretty clear sailing all the way. A lot of the time there is a problem on the 5 going up the mountain, if this happens the 5/405 junction can suck major. Being on the 210 at this point can save 1 hour or more. (And... yes, I have sat in an hour plus traffic at the 5/405 merge, to then look in my mirriors and see no one on the 210 :evil: )

Some people prefer 5 -> 605 -> 210 -> 14. But everytime I try that the traffic from Fullerton to the 605 junction bites. So I get off the 5 earlier.

John Payne will swear up and down that the 405 is always good. But 9 out of 10 times I've taken the 405 to get through L.A. it sucks!

My $0.02


Well, Mikey, since you involved me in this discussion, MY $ .02:
I've converted from using both (15 to 138 to 14) and (405 to 14)to 5 to 57 to 210 to 14 on the way up (this is usually during the am and pretty much assures me I'll be avoiding any L.A. related problems). On the way back I take the same way I came up if I leave the track late afternoon. If I leave after dinner, I take 5 all the way back--it's the shortest distance and there's no faster route.
See y'all up there. I'll be goin' up Thursday afternoon for T/T Fri. Let's hope for some better weather than forecast right now!!!
User avatar
JHPGT3
Time Trialer
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 4:42 pm

Previous

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests

cron