Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

A place to hang out and discuss all things Porsche.

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby rshon on Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:59 pm

Letting go of the steering wheel is also hard to explain to students... especially when WE don't want them to do that :P
Russell
PCA Zone 8 Rules Tech Advisor
Z8 TT/DE Chair ('20-'22)
Z8 Rules Chair ('12-'18)


Porsche Boxster S
Scion FR-S
Lotus Exige S
Toyota 4Runner TRD Off Road
User avatar
rshon
Time Trialer
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:07 pm
Location: Tace et Fruor Equito

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby ttweed on Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:31 am

Steve Grosekemper wrote:Tom, I think you are taking creative license in describing the experience. I know you can't help it being a writer; but really???

Yes, hyperbole may be my strong suit, but I wish we had some in-car video to look at. Unless the camera could pan out the side windows, I don't think we would be seeing where the course was going for most of those laps from a fixed mount! :mrgreen:

I was in total "Control" of the situation.

I would never dispute that fact, but have to admit I could not have saved half those slides. Old age dulls the reflexes...  :bowdown:
I think all you need is some of those Kumho Ecsta SPT tires that throw off colored smoke and you could join up with the FormulaD guys and make some money with those skillz!

I put you in the car because I didn't want to waste all that giggling on myself...Hope you enjoyed yourself.

Oh I did! I took my blood pressure medication that morning, so there was little risk of a heart attack, and I definitely didn't need any more coffee after that first session.
:rockon:

TT
Tom Tweed -- #908
SDR Tech Inspection Chair 2005-06
SDR Forum Admin 2010-present
Windblown Witness Assistant Editor 2012-present
Driving Porsches since 1964
User avatar
ttweed
Admin
 
Posts: 1851
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 7:13 am
Location: La Jolla, CA

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Steve Grosekemper on Tue Jun 08, 2010 7:58 am

ttweed wrote:
Steve Grosekemper wrote:Tom, I think you are taking creative license in describing the experience. I know you can't help it being a writer; but really???

Yes, hyperbole may be my strong suit, but I wish we had some in-car video to look at. Unless the camera could pan out the side windows, I don't think we would be seeing where the course was going for most of those laps from a fixed mount! :mrgreen:

I was in total "Control" of the situation.

I would never dispute that fact, but have to admit I could not have saved half those slides. Old age dulls the reflexes...  :bowdown:
I think all you need is some of those Kumho Ecsta SPT tires that throw off colored smoke and you could join up with the FormulaD guys and make some money with those skillz!

I put you in the car because I didn't want to waste all that giggling on myself...Hope you enjoyed yourself.

Oh I did! I took my blood pressure medication that morning, so there was little risk of a heart attack, and I definitely didn't need any more coffee after that first session.
:rockon:

TT


OK- I don't think I can argue with any of that... But I am glad you enjoyed the ride. 8)
Steve Grosekemper #97
http://www.911SG.com
https://www.facebook.com/911steveg/
https://www.instagram.com/steve911sg/
PCA-SDR Tech Advisor/Scrutineer/Forum-Admin
1997 993S & 986S street cars & 911SC track car.
User avatar
Steve Grosekemper
Admin
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:15 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Dan Chambers on Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:19 am

Kim Crosser wrote:

Some of us were discussing that this was NOT a good teaching track - at least not for beginning students. ....


Unfortunately true. With my "never-autocrossed-before" student, the effect of soooo many 180-degree turns (I counted 7) and many of those being less than 50' radius, the overwhelming issue for my student was being lost, being a little queezy - even when he was driving - and suffering a mild case of post-lap directional tumult from constant 180-turn syndrome. In the end, we focused exclusively on car control and driving technique and threw "the line" completely out the window since trying to stress apexes on such a busy track was not aiding smooth transitions and good car control.

Had any of the AX design team driven the course with a little speed prior to the event, they might have realized how complex ... and potentially "challenging" ... the course would have been. They may possibly have reconsidered portions of the design element.

When Carl, Gary, and I were AX Chairs we religiously drove the proposed courses prior to every event. Often we'd drive the designed course at 50% speed (or even faster) in Carl's PT Cruiser to determine the characteristics of the course and the appropriate level of speed vs. difficulty vs just plan fun and good track rhythm. Sadly, my encouragement to the AX Chairs who followed us to pre-drive the courses to determine design characteristics has fallen mostly on deaf ears. Sometimes that leads to designs that look awesome on paper, and turn from a beautiful swan on paper to an ugly duckling when driven. But ... that's just my personal opinion and bears no criticism what so ever to the great job the AX Chairs have been doing all year.

I have just one question: :?: what's so wrong about straight-away's? :?: I haven't seen one in a while. :cry:

Just my ramblings....
Dan Chambers
"It's just a "well prepared" street car ... or a very, very well-mannered track car." :burnout:
1983 SC #91 3.6L, "Black Pearl" Livery
1987 944 (gone but not forgotten)
User avatar
Dan Chambers
Pro Racer
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Kim Crosser on Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:12 am

While it may not have been a good track for teaching beginners, it was a VERY fun track to drive, and a good track for teaching some advanced techniques. In order to go fast, you needed to really use the "turn early, gas, and let momentum slide your car past the apex cone while accelerating" technique throughout most of the first third of the course.
Our tracks don't have to be excellent teaching tracks all the time - sometimes, just a fun track for the more experienced drivers can work too. :rockon:
2012 Panamera 4
2013 Cayenne
2008-2009 Treasurer
User avatar
Kim Crosser
Club Racer
 
Posts: 791
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Rancho Santa Fe, CA

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Steve Grosekemper on Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:47 am

Kim Crosser wrote:While it may not have been a good track for teaching beginners, it was a VERY fun track to drive, and a good track for teaching some advanced techniques. In order to go fast, you needed to really use the "turn early, gas, and let momentum slide your car past the apex cone while accelerating" technique throughout most of the first third of the course.
Our tracks don't have to be excellent teaching tracks all the time - sometimes, just a fun track for the more experienced drivers can work too. :rockon:


I disagree...
This track promoted excessive sliding of the car and abuse of the tires.
When I worked corners just down from the Bud sign it was obvious just how bad the track was due to every car transitioning from left to right in a slide...
Not drifting, but sliding. The excessive use of 180 +/- degree off camber turns was not enjoyable or good for cars.
One of these elements is fine, maybe two if track layout dictates; but this was excessive.
If this track was laid out again, I would just stay home.
That being said, the previous track was awesome with really great rhythm and variation of elements.
I would do that track again anytime.
I know the AX team has a tough time with keeping variation and trying to find the last bits of good asphalt, but I wouldn't cry if this design was not reused.

Just my 2 cents.
Steve Grosekemper #97
http://www.911SG.com
https://www.facebook.com/911steveg/
https://www.instagram.com/steve911sg/
PCA-SDR Tech Advisor/Scrutineer/Forum-Admin
1997 993S & 986S street cars & 911SC track car.
User avatar
Steve Grosekemper
Admin
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:15 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Dan Chambers on Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:17 am

Steve Grosekemper wrote:If this track was laid out again, I would just stay home.


+1.

3' to 5', glassy w/ off-shore winds to 4 knots, water temp 63-degrees vs. the last track? No brainer! :roflmao:
Dan Chambers
"It's just a "well prepared" street car ... or a very, very well-mannered track car." :burnout:
1983 SC #91 3.6L, "Black Pearl" Livery
1987 944 (gone but not forgotten)
User avatar
Dan Chambers
Pro Racer
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby gulf911 on Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:23 am

Steve Grosekemper wrote:If this track was laid out again, I would just stay home.


+1 and just an extra wish that maybe we could layout tracks that were more SDR like and not SCCA like?
Dan Andrews
#2 Carmine Red GT4 , 19" Forgelines , LWBS.
User avatar
gulf911
Pro Racer
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 5:17 pm
Location: San Clemente

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Mmagus on Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:24 am

Dan Chambers wrote:
Kim Crosser wrote:

Some of us were discussing that this was NOT a good teaching track - at least not for beginning students. ....


Had any of the AX design team driven the course with a little speed prior to the event, they might have realized how complex ... and potentially "challenging" ... the course would have been. They may possibly have reconsidered portions of the design element.

Sadly, my encouragement to the AX Chairs who followed us to pre-drive the courses to determine design characteristics has fallen mostly on deaf ears. Sometimes that leads to designs that look awesome on paper, and turn from a beautiful swan on paper to an ugly duckling when driven. But ... that's just my personal opinion and bears no criticism what so ever to the great job the AX Chairs have been doing all year.

I have just one question: :?: what's so wrong about straight-away's? :?: I haven't seen one in a while. :cry:

Just my ramblings....



I was not at the last AX, however I do need to chime in regarding part of this. Your words of advice have been listend to. Kari and I have helped set up the severl AX's previous to this one and I can GUARENTEE that the track was test driven prior to the event by an AX chair and and ...ummm....un-named assisant.. 8) in two seperate vevehicles at various speeds. Additionally, Jerry posted that only 1/3 of the track was able to be set because another group had us of the facility, so driving it before the crack of dawn Sat. morn would not have been possible. :surr:
85.1 944 Sparky
'87 924S "Tuffy" #123, CC03
'81 928 "Leviathan" Gone to the great beyond.
User avatar
Mmagus
Club Racer
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:43 pm

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Sawfish on Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:30 pm

I had a great time :rockon: Thanks everyone for all the hard work!
Chris
Christian Harris
1972 914 #780
Sawfish
Autocrosser
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:39 pm

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby JERRY B on Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:14 pm

The people that desinged & setup the track really liked it, Weird 8)
The people that pre drove liked it, Strange :?
HINT HINT :banghead:
JERRY BUMPUS
Semi Retired Autocross Chair
2004 Cayenne Turbo The Great White Beast
2006 Cayman S The Other White Car
91 944s2 aka The White Car
89 944 TAZ The Not White Car
87 944s Ka BOOOM Car sold
86 944 aka The Black Car sold
User avatar
JERRY B
Time Trialer
 
Posts: 471
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 1:52 pm
Location: THE DIDO

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Bill Behun on Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:41 pm

WOW - personally, I enjoyed the track.
I even liked the 180 degree turns as it reinforced (to me) the idea of slow in-fast out.
Some being off-camber made it a real challenge and you would learn quickly what happens when you go in too fast.

Regarding pre-driving the couse like Dan, Gary and Carl always did - there was a Street Legal event Friday night and the full course could not even be set up. Thus, no chance for Jerry & Don to drive it.
'80 911SC (AX FUN)
'94 968 "Practical" Porsche
User avatar
Bill Behun
Time Trialer
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:23 am
Location: San Diego

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby Don Middleton on Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:37 pm

Bill Behun wrote:WOW - personally, I enjoyed the track...


Hey Bill, second in the BRI, I hope you enjoyed it. 8) There isn't much room for enjoying more, is there? :wink: Well, maybe we should ask Erik how he liked it. :wink:
Don Middleton
'88 Carrera - show
'85 Carrera - track
'82 911SC -- hot rod
User avatar
Don Middleton
Time Trialer
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Mt. Helix/La Mesa

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby hmeeder on Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:56 pm

ttweed wrote:Lastly, I'm a little curious about what caused some of the DNRs? Herb and Sean's 914 didn't make timed runs, nor did Sean Dynes, and Dan Andrews dropped out after one run? What happened, guys?

TT


Well, our failure was more "tragic" than "catastrophic" thankfully. Nasty, lumpy, "could that be rod failure?" kind of knocking pulled us off the track on the 5th lap of the day. It was a heart wrenching sound and we didn't press it an inch further.

Towed the 10JREEN out of there (at 10am! too soon!) and by 2:00 we had the trans and motor out and discovered that one of the fan mount bolts decided to have its own autocross around the fan shroud (blue loctite wasn't enough for the abuse we put that thing through.) produced a solid knock that you could feel through the case.

By 8pm the motor had been stripped down, some "while we are in there" maintenance and loving. The tins and top of the motor is about to go back on and the trans (with a fresh cut on the PP and flywheel and a fresh clutch) and the car goes back together tonight.

We have a race in Alameda on Saturday, so we are grateful that we are able to get the beast back together as quickly as we can.

I'm pretty bummed that I didn't get to turn even 1 lap on the track. It looked plenty busy and I was really looking forward to taking advantage of our weight (and a little bit of treachery.)

As for straightaways, they are over-rated. Anyone can drive fast in a straight line. It's what we do at the end of that straight that I find interesting. We are trying to optimize the car for autocross and 90 mph straights aren't in that formula.

Anyone autocrossed in other parts of the country? Sometimes you are lucky to get a 30 second lap and never get to take the car out of 2nd gear. We are spoiled by what we get here in SDR, yet it is human nature to always want more.

If a straight is what you want, there's a DE at the end of the month. My $.02
Herb Meeder
'72 914 10JREEN
2.4 liter aluminum handgrenade
(no longer blowed up)
User avatar
hmeeder
Autocrosser
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 5:58 pm

Re: Autocross Results June 5th, 2010

Postby ttweed on Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:34 pm

hmeeder wrote: Well, our failure was more "tragic" than "catastrophic" thankfully.


Glad it wasn't any worse, Herb. Too bad you didn't get any timed runs, the 10JREEN would have done well on that track.

TT
Tom Tweed -- #908
SDR Tech Inspection Chair 2005-06
SDR Forum Admin 2010-present
Windblown Witness Assistant Editor 2012-present
Driving Porsches since 1964
User avatar
ttweed
Admin
 
Posts: 1851
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 7:13 am
Location: La Jolla, CA

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests