
Steve Grosekemper wrote:Tom, I think you are taking creative license in describing the experience. I know you can't help it being a writer; but really???
I was in total "Control" of the situation.
I put you in the car because I didn't want to waste all that giggling on myself...Hope you enjoyed yourself.
ttweed wrote:Steve Grosekemper wrote:Tom, I think you are taking creative license in describing the experience. I know you can't help it being a writer; but really???
Yes, hyperbole may be my strong suit, but I wish we had some in-car video to look at. Unless the camera could pan out the side windows, I don't think we would be seeing where the course was going for most of those laps from a fixed mount!
I was in total "Control" of the situation.
I would never dispute that fact, but have to admit I could not have saved half those slides. Old age dulls the reflexes...![]()
I think all you need is some of those Kumho Ecsta SPT tires that throw off colored smoke and you could join up with the FormulaD guys and make some money with those skillz!I put you in the car because I didn't want to waste all that giggling on myself...Hope you enjoyed yourself.
Oh I did! I took my blood pressure medication that morning, so there was little risk of a heart attack, and I definitely didn't need any more coffee after that first session.![]()
TT
Kim Crosser wrote:
Some of us were discussing that this was NOT a good teaching track - at least not for beginning students. ....
Kim Crosser wrote:While it may not have been a good track for teaching beginners, it was a VERY fun track to drive, and a good track for teaching some advanced techniques. In order to go fast, you needed to really use the "turn early, gas, and let momentum slide your car past the apex cone while accelerating" technique throughout most of the first third of the course.
Our tracks don't have to be excellent teaching tracks all the time - sometimes, just a fun track for the more experienced drivers can work too.
Steve Grosekemper wrote:If this track was laid out again, I would just stay home.
Steve Grosekemper wrote:If this track was laid out again, I would just stay home.
Dan Chambers wrote:Kim Crosser wrote:
Some of us were discussing that this was NOT a good teaching track - at least not for beginning students. ....
Had any of the AX design team driven the course with a little speed prior to the event, they might have realized how complex ... and potentially "challenging" ... the course would have been. They may possibly have reconsidered portions of the design element.
Sadly, my encouragement to the AX Chairs who followed us to pre-drive the courses to determine design characteristics has fallen mostly on deaf ears. Sometimes that leads to designs that look awesome on paper, and turn from a beautiful swan on paper to an ugly duckling when driven. But ... that's just my personal opinion and bears no criticism what so ever to the great job the AX Chairs have been doing all year.
I have just one question:what's so wrong about straight-away's?
I haven't seen one in a while.
![]()
Just my ramblings....
Bill Behun wrote:WOW - personally, I enjoyed the track...
ttweed wrote:Lastly, I'm a little curious about what caused some of the DNRs? Herb and Sean's 914 didn't make timed runs, nor did Sean Dynes, and Dan Andrews dropped out after one run? What happened, guys?
TT
hmeeder wrote: Well, our failure was more "tragic" than "catastrophic" thankfully.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests