Red Rooster wrote:mark k wrote:I dont know if my extra hp would have saved you from that spanking at streets.BTW a early car stipped down weighs about 2200 lbs or less.
Mark
It may not have been the h.p. difference b'tween Dan's (or Richard Parks or my...) 3.2L and your (or any other 3.6L enetered..) at SoW....but I think the difference in usable torque b'tween a 3.2L and a 3.6L is a factor that needs to be acknowledged.
I have not done a comprehensive search, and I am still looking for another PCA TT or AX class other than AM where the results of the last rules change enable cars with such different base engines (3.6 vs. 3.2) to be competing in the same class.
Don't get me wrong, the rules are the rules...don't like 'em...don't have to play. Simple.
But... it's extremely difficult for for any 3.2L to beat up on a 3.6L in an equally pointed out AM car.
Mark, I KNOW you are a vastly superior driver than I am ...and a heck of a cool guy tooand Dan is a lot better driver than me as well...but historically I have been able to joust with Dan all day long since we both have 3.2L's...but if you come out in AM with a 3.6L powered car....game over....we might be able to hang with you for a lap while we fade back as we go....but 3.6L power will and does, eventually just overwhelm most any 3.2L...the 3.6L just has more plain 'ol low and mid range grunt, and will just out power a 3.2L, especially in cars of nearly the same weight.
I think as long as the current rules are in effect, there is no complaining, only a realization that the days of AM being an early bodied 911 class with RS flares and 3.2L motors is over. Those cars are now obsolete....
Good points John, and I would have to agree. Rules are rules and for a .50 ribbon I am just going to go out and have some fun...
