Steve Grosekemper wrote:I'll be staying at "The Suites" in the lap of Luxury.
Who's Luxury??

Steve Grosekemper wrote:I'll be staying at "The Suites" in the lap of Luxury.
Jackie C wrote:Unfortunately, property taxes trump BW for us, but the food fest will return next year, bigger and better! Oh yeah, the car will be improved as well...
Jackie C wrote:Hey Tom,
Lucky for me, that rule has been fixed.
ttweed wrote:Jackie C wrote:Hey Tom,
Lucky for me, that rule has been fixed.
Fixed? It wasn't ever broken, and it's still the same as it ever was--it hasn't changed. See Sec. II.F in the Zone 8 rulebook: "Entrants may compete in a higher class as long as the car conforms to the rules for that class. Cars may move up vertically or horizontally, but not backwards, into a higher class. A car in class CP, for example, may run in AI or FP, but not in FS."
TT
ttweed wrote:Jackie C wrote:Hey Tom,
Lucky for me, that rule has been fixed.
Fixed? It wasn't ever broken, and it's still the same as it ever was--it hasn't changed. See Sec. II.F in the Zone 8 rulebook: "Entrants may compete in a higher class as long as the car conforms to the rules for that class. Cars may move up vertically or horizontally, but not backwards, into a higher class. A car in class CP, for example, may run in AI or FP, but not in FS."
TT
Like this is the first thread on the forum to ever "tangentiate" off topic?Dan Chambers wrote:What's this got to do with Buttonwillow and the upcoming Time Trial? Tom, please consider starting a new thread if you want to argue the merits of FP qualifying for GP.
ttweed wrote:Like this is the first thread on the forum to ever "tangentiate" off topic?Dan Chambers wrote:What's this got to do with Buttonwillow and the upcoming Time Trial? Tom, please consider starting a new thread if you want to argue the merits of FP qualifying for GP.![]()
And after your appeal to not hijack the thread, your next post does what? Pretty much goes on to argue against the notion of FP qualifying for GP, it seems to me. C'mon, Dan! Have it one way or the other, please.
Regardless, I will start a new thread to clarify this rules question so as not to offend or confuse the people who are looking here for information on the Buttonwillow TT.
Dan Chambers wrote:Tom, you're absolutely right. My bad. As Tom C. would say; "I should be taken out back and shot."I have failed the forum.
ttweed wrote:It must have been the drugs you mentioned, Dan.![]()
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 50 guests