Sawfish wrote:Never did hear the "raffle" results for who got the Tesla ride on the track
Of course, I checked around lunch time to see if I had won a track session, but no joy. The only name i recognized from the cards that were drawn from the jar was Craig Hill, who usually drives a blue GT3 with his lovely wife, Michele. He was walking up to the Tesla booth with his helmet right after my parking lot test drive, and I had to stifle my jealousy.
Hopefully, some of the lucky winners are members of the forum and can report on the car's handling at the limit. I must say from my brief experience that I was startled by how much performance the Tesla engineers have wrung out of the electric drivetrain. They truly were focused on performance, and making the roadster a sports-purpose car. Most EVs are designed for efficiency and utility rather than performance, and acceleration is limited to more "normal" levels of a street car. This is a compromise to preserve the battery pack and not squander the available power, but rather to maximize range, which is a concern for people who must commute fairly long distances on a daily basis. I can say without a doubt that this compromise was not implemented in the Tesla. They chose to utilize
all the power available from the AC motor and make up for the battery drain under such circumstances with a huge battery storage capacity. The 56kWh pack in the Tesla is over
twice the capacity of the 26kWh pack in the Nissan Leaf (whose electric motor is way less than half as powerful), yet the car weighs a full 600 lbs. less. Of course, it can only handle 2 occupants and little cargo as opposed to the 5 passengers plus trunk area of the econobox hatchback, but driven judiciously, it will go over twice as far without re-charging, accelerate over twice as fast, and achieve a top speed 30 mph higher than the Leaf. This is pretty amazing engineering.
After seeing how wide-open they allow the motor to operate, I definitely have to lower my estimate of what the range might be when driven "flat out" on the track, though. They are allowing the 288hp induction motor to draw prodigious amounts of juice from the battery to enable the kind of wide-open performance it achieves. I can see now how 55 laps in a track environment could use 80% of the available charge under those conditions. The Top Gear track at Dunsford Aerodrome is about a 1.75 mile circuit, so 55 laps would be 96.25 miles. If what the Tesla spokesperson said was true, that the car never had less than a 20% charge and did not need to be pushed off the track with a dead battery, as Clarkson dramatized it, then the Roadster's efficiency dropped by 50% when driven flat out, which is quite a bit higher than my previous 30% estimate, reducing available range from the claimed 245 miles to something like 120 or so. This makes sense to me now, though, seeing how little "governing" of the drivetrain is done to limit its power consumption. You would have to drive the car in a "hypermiling" manner to achieve maximum range, and that would not include stomping on the go-pedal exiting every corner!
If you took this technology and applied it to a purpose-built autocross car, the results might be quite startling. Stripping the car of creature comforts and also reducing its weight by installing a smaller battery pack capable of only completing the 20 miles or so necessary for an autox, along with some sticky rubber, i wonder what could be achieved? While there still may be a weight disadvantage to ICE cars, the fact they are not "gearing dependent" in order to keep the motor in the peak torque range may make a big difference--no shifting anywhere around the course, and no waiting for the engine to "ramp-up" out of those slow second-gear corners! I didn't really see what kind of times were being turned by the Teslas, but of course this is very driver and tire dependent. I did see that they were running the Advan Neovas, which are a very capable S/S tire. Did anyone notice how their times compared to the S/S Porsches?
I do know that there is talk in the SCCA of developing EV classes for Solo racing. Endurance racing is a whole 'nother ball of wax, but I know that in Europe, they are launching an EV road racing sprint series next year:
http://www.evcup.com/ I guess we'll see how that goes. I wonder what it will be like to see cars ripping around a track without the usual engine noise? Less satisfying for fans, possibly, without the aural input?
And don't forget the EV racing motorbikes:
http://ridemission.com/motorsport/mission-r, and the Lawless Rocket Drag Bike that was built by Orange County Choppers and
did 177 mph @ 7.46 in the 1/4 mile!
http://www.nedra.com/, not to mention this San Diego-based drag car company that I encountered at the auto show last year:
http://ssi-racing.com/. "Lucky Dave" M. was talking to me yesterday about his days as a sponsored electric RC car racer! The near-future of this technology is going to be very intriguing, to say the least. Our dino-powered cars are not going to be displaced, but there are going to be some fun alternatives in motorsports developing.
TT