Approx. another 5 years. The Snell ratings are usually updated in 5 year intervals, and a helmet is usually approved for 2 cycles (which equals a 10 year useful life).GeorgeB wrote:how long should the 2000 helmet bt good for??
Tim Comeau wrote:Steve, Thanks for your work on the rules, and thanks even more for trying to get the word out about the changes. Nice of you.
thofmann wrote:Last summer, I bought an M2005 helmet to replace my obsolete M95. Now I see that the M2005 suddenly became illegal, whereas an M2000 can still be used for AX.
Am I to believe that an M2000 helmet is safer than an M2005? This doesn't make any sense to me. The only logical rule would be to allow M2005 helmets until the M2000s become obselete.
Do I really have to buy yet another helmet, because I didn't anticipate the rule change?
Thomas
Steve Grosekemper wrote:But as the new rule states your M2005 is still good for AX.
The following helmets are approved for Autocross use: 2000 SA or M and 2005 SA.
kurquhart wrote:Steve Grosekemper wrote:But as the new rule states your M2005 is still good for AX.
I don't read the new rule that way.The following helmets are approved for Autocross use: 2000 SA or M and 2005 SA.
My understanding for disallowing 2005 M was to phase out M altogether in a few more years.
ttweed wrote:I think Kris is right, a strict reading of the rules would imply that M2005 helmets are not eligible for autocross events, even, in 2007, but I can't believe that was the intent, if M2000 helmets are still allowed. I think the reasoning behind the change was to discourage people from buying any new M-2005 helmets and get SA-certified ones instead, but I think people like Thomas who have an M2005 should be "grandfathered in" somehow, under the provision for M2000 helmets, since the M2005 Snell standard is at least as good, if not better.
TT
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests