by ttweed on Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:37 am
Jerry-
I am no authority on this, and I would encourage you to contact the Rules Chair directly for an authoritative answer, but here's my take on it.
The section of the rules that addresses this is XIII.A. (Safety Considerations) It depends on what class you are running, and whether it is a TT/DE or autox event. Halo straps are still allowed if "use of a Halo strap is part of the harness manufacturer’s approved configuration." Also, "“H” style harnesses installed prior to 2004 may remain if they are in good condition and adjustment and if the use of the H style is part of the harness manufacturer’s approved configuration."
The anti-sub strap, however, "must be routed through the seat bottom in a hole and routing created by the seat manufacturer or in compliance with the harness
manufacturer’s configurations, including the angle of the belt."
For TT/DE events, "five or six-point harnesses are required for all drivers and passengers running in any Prepared class or higher." So, if you are in Stock class (or SS), you can use factory 3-point restraints, if they are less than 20 years old and in good condition. For autox, 5 or 6-point restraints are recommended, but not required.
The key wording is in the first paragraph of the section: "The entrant needs to be prepared to show that the installation is within the manufacturer's recommended configurations whenever asked by a tech inspector." If you cannot find anything supporting the use of a halo strap on the Schroth website, I would contact them to see if this is just an omission. In this age of product liability litigation, however, most manufacturers may be hesitant to support anything but the strictest installation standards, unfortunately.
For the formula-type, 6-point anti-sub belts, the Scroth installation instructions say: "The indirect routing requires a type of preloading of the anti-submarining straps during a frontal impact. This is achieved by sitting on the anti-submarining straps, routing them rearwards and attaching them in the region near or on the lap belt anchorages." This would indicate to me that you are OK on the anti-sub belts, unless their routing over the rear seat edge includes a turn down to the attachment points, which would allow extra slack in the belts. They specifically say that this is unacceptable.
The Zone 8 rules also say in XIII.A.3.: "Seats that eliminate substantial contact of the lap belt with the occupant will be disallowed", so if the routing of your lap belts over the seat cushion or side allows for extra slack or prevents "substantial contact", they would not be allowed.
In S or SS class, factory stock 3-point restraints may be the cheapest option, but they are sub-optimal in my view, for safety and driver comfort/control reasons. If factory replacements are expensive, all the more reason to go to a race setup. You could also investigate re-webbing of the factory setup, if your stock belts are old. I see nothing directly addressing this option in the rules, though, so I would seek a clarification about that before proceeding.
I do not really understand your statement that "We don't want to live with racing seats." Modern racing seats are designed to allow drivers to compete in long enduros in comfort and safety, so what is so "unliveable" about them for street use? Yes, it takes longer to strap into them, but how much of a bother is it to take a few more moments preparing to drive? Yes, some race seats have a minimum of padding, but many are quite comfortable, and if you need more softness, a few removeable pads can be customized and added for street driving. What is the beef (besides having to spend the extra $$$)? There are even some tilting versions available for access to the rear seats, if that is an issue. Although it is a bit of a hassle, race seats can also be swapped out for stock in between events.
TT
Tom Tweed -- #908
SDR Tech Inspection Chair 2005-06
SDR Forum Admin 2010-present
Windblown Witness Assistant Editor 2012-present
Driving Porsches since 1964