mrondeau wrote: We are looking for feedback from instructors, volunteers and students regarding this event. Please email us at
cdi@pcasdr.org and let us know your thoughts. All of your emails will be confidential unless you tell us otherwise.
I have no reason to keep this confidential, and would actually like to illicit a broader discussion of it among the instructor/volunteer cadre. I am wondering if it isn't time to review/alter the "traditional" course layout for the "mock autox" on Sunday. I understand from past discussions with various CDIs that maintaining an identical (or at least a very similar) course for each school has been desirable, from the standpoint that the instructors are all familiar with it and will be able to begin coaching the students immediately regarding the nuances of its elements. For various reasons, I think it's time to re-evaluate this strategy.
Firstly, the condition of the west lot is ever-changing. The surface is getting sketchy in more places all the time, and the addition of obstacles like the "Budweiser Pavilion" has already forced us to alter the course substantially at times. Even though the slalom section at the south end of the course was reconfigured this time to try to avoid the worst surface conditions, it was HELLACIOUSLY bumpy and rough coming out of it and trying to set up the following righthander. You either had to back off on charging the next corner or abuse the car's suspension pretty badly, and deal with it hopping sideways over the swale and bumps, etc.
Secondly, I really don't like staging the event from the north end of the lot. There is
so much more shelter, shade, and room beneath the trolley tracks at the south end that I can't help but wonder why we continue to hang on to this tradition and bake in the sun (or sit out in the rain) under the Budweiser sign.

I would much prefer to be pitted under the trolley tracks.
At normal autocrosses, the instructors must learn a new course and get up to speed quickly to help the student master it, so shouldn't they be able to do this at the school? Is there some other reason for maintaining the traditional course that I am missing? Couldn't we at least establish a "new norm" for a school course staging from the south end (which would also have to be altered depending on prevailing surfaces/obstacles each time), or perhaps allow the instructors to have a few parade laps for familiarization before the start, if that is a desirable teaching condition?
That's my $0.02, and I'd like to hear what others think.
TT