Irksome wrote:Last year, 944 Spec cars were listed as '944', and always participated in the BRI ranking. This event, it appears that 944 Spec cars are listed as '944spec', and none of them received a BRI ranking. Is there a reason for this, or just a hiccup?
It didn't matter for top 10 BRI (adjusted times for top 10 were all below the unadjusted 944spec times), but it looks like those 5 drivers were left out of the fun.
Tim Comeau wrote:I see the BRI as "just for fun."
The last iteration of the BRI that I saw had the 944Spec index as 1.040, the same as GP class. See the "BRI explained" page.Tim Comeau wrote: Also,
I believe the BRI uses a class FI multiplier for the 944 Spec cars when they are closer to a GP car?
It's that way in every class, Tim, but I think Prepared class now goes from 9-20 points, not 7-20, and the spread just gets bigger in the higher classes. Improved is 21-40! If you aren't running an optimized car for the class, which is what the BRI assumes, you can still be pretty happy about beating anyone who is. The Spec classes are definitely closer in prep than anything except Street Stock, maybe.In any case, when you realize how big the point spread can be in GP and all the cars in that class get the same multiplier, it's difficult to take the BRI seriously at all. A 7 point car gets the same handicap as a 20 point car?![]()
As it always has been.I see the BRI as "just for fun."
Make that 7 drivers--look at me and Mark Garriott in "X" class! An index of 3.00 is ridiculous. My adjusted time was over 226 seconds! In order to place in the top 10 BRI positions, I would have had to run that course in 28.5 seconds. That wouldn't be possible in any car, even the most exotic autox "special" you could dream up.Irksome wrote:...it looks like those 5 drivers were left out of the fun.
ttweed wrote:Make that 7 drivers--look at me and Mark Garriott in "X" class!Irksome wrote:...it looks like those 5 drivers were left out of the fun.
TT
ChuckS wrote:Speaking of indexing, shouldn't someone be changing the index for the IS class? When virtually everyone in IS can get into the top 10 BRI, it seems that the index might be too low!
I know I will receive hate mail from around 4 - 5 IS class guys, but ....
Any thoughts?
It's kind of like Lincoln said : "You can please most of the people some of the time, and some of the people most of the time. But you can't please all of the people all of the time." .... Or something like that.
This is somewhat correct, I think. The S or SS classes are almost NEVER in the top 10 on raw time, unless you are driving a GT2/GT3 in S class like Steve Eguina or Steve Dente. The BRI was intended to give some "mock" glory to those in the lower classes whose cars did not have the speed potential to achieve a top-10 finish, but were nevertheless driven very close to their limits on any given day.Dan Chambers wrote: 2) The BRI was intended to give SS and S classes a distinct advantage, so should we be surprised that alot of BRI winners are in S or SS classes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests