martinreinhardt wrote:I uploaded the AX results.
It also seemed that after a full day with not many spins, many folks felt that the could magicly just get faster and still hold those lines in Timed runs and it was a spin fest. lol I know that all set us behind on time but you were all very patient and flexible and I thank you for it. I hope everyone had fun.
or this one
The really painful, though VERY informative thing I found out, is that its not the car....its me.
ttweed wrote:martinreinhardt wrote:I uploaded the AX results.
Thanks for getting the results up so quickly once again, Martin, especially on the days when I can't stay to the bitter end and see the final results at the track. Too many fast cars and drivers came out yesterday for me to get anywhere near the top 10 again, though.![]()
I can see that there is another father/son battle besides the Kinninger's where youth and talent is overcoming age and cunning--it looks like Peter Middleton beat Don by over a second in II class.![]()
It was good to see Dan A. and Mick R. come down from up north, but they are both DNR in the results? What happened guys?
That was an awful fast track--I spent more time on it in third gear than any AX course I have ever run, and I have NEVER been in third gear before the first turn at an AX before. We all like fast and open courses, they're great fun (until, as John Straub would say, "somebody puts their eye out.") But drag strip starts are hard on the equipment, and fast finishes with little runoff before the K-rail makes for some flat-spotted tires and DNFs that might be avoided by a little more conventional and conservative course design, perhaps? Just a thought. The last two courses have had very quick finishes, and been really difficult for the fastest cars to get slowed down enough to make the quick turns into the hot pits that have been laid out.
I enjoyed seeing Randy Wells from the PNW out running with us yesterday, co-driving Nick Psyllos' car. He is a fantastic photographer and writer--many of you may have seen some of his images and read some of his articles in Excellence and other magazines over the years. He is also a very accomplished autocrosser, having placed highly in national SCCA events in his 911 over the years. Check out his blog sometime at http://randywells.com/blog/, and definitely follow the links to some of his images.
Thanks to the whole autox team for another great event!
TT
ttweed wrote:We all like fast and open courses, they're great fun (until, as John Straub would say, "somebody puts their eye out.") But drag strip starts are hard on the equipment, and fast finishes with little runoff before the K-rail makes for some flat-spotted tires and DNFs that might be avoided by a little more conventional and conservative course design, perhaps? Just a thought. The last two courses have had very quick finishes, and been really difficult for the fastest cars to get slowed down enough to make the quick turns into the hot pits that have been laid out.

ttweed wrote:...I can see that there is another father/son battle besides the Kinninger's where youth and talent is overcoming age and cunning--it looks like Peter Middleton beat Don by over a second in II class.
Mmagus wrote:Great driving everyone! It was a tough day as even after carfully laying the course, the surface just kept exploding on us.It also seemed that after a full day with not many spins, many folks felt that the could magicly just get faster and still hold those lines in Timed runs and it was a spin fest. lol I know that all set us behind on time but you were all very patient and flexible and I thank you for it. I hope everyone had fun...
Finishing on a straight is a fine idea to protect the timing equipment, but the length of that straight and the possible speed through the final turn before the finishing straight is critical. They must be gauged to the capabilities of the fastest cars (with the least experienced drivers) running. Last month, my student had an RX-7 Mazda with an LS6 SBC V-8 in it (430HP in a 2300 lb. car on street tires w/ marginal brakes). The torque of that car allowed him such a squirt of speed out of the last turn to the finish line that he could not easily slow down enough before the right turn back to the grid. I finally told him that he would probably have to lift before the finish line in order to stay on the course after the finish and not DNF or hit cones. I almost went off myself the first time I went through the lights at speed and did not immediately threshold brake to "whoa up" enough, and then still had to trail brake through the turn to make it, so I don't agree that last month's course was a whole lot better. It didn't have any K-rail behind it though, just much softer spectators.Mmagus wrote:As to the finish...last month I beg to differ. For the safety of the timing equipment we try to finish on a straight, and there was a lot of run off space.
You must mean in timed runs only one car DNF'd? I was parked down by the finish, and all day in practice cars without ABS were locking brakes after the finish and running down and through the cones on the outside of the left turn leading to the grid. For several practice sessions, no one even picked up the downed cones there as they were hit so often. I agree that there was probably enough runoff after the cones to prevent anyone from hitting the K-rail unless they had total brake failure or brain fade (which can't really be planned for in any case). But even with my little 180HP/2300lb. car I was still trail braking to make it around that turn, even after threshold braking immediately after the finish. IMHO, the final turn was just too fast. Either the radius of that turn needed to be reduced to lower entry and cornering speed, or the timing lights needed to be moved up the course 15 or 20' to reduce the acceleration distance after the exit and before the finish, which would have also increased the straight-line braking zone. With lower cornering speed in the final corner, you don't need as much distance to the timing lights to protect them from a car that spins there, as they won't slide as far because they are going slower when they lose control. That last turn should probably be the slowest one on the course, just to "whoa" drivers up before the finish naturally, and save the threshold braking for the long straightaways instead of after the lights.This month we struggled with the finish, I admit, we changed the finish three times from the first drawn design, though to my knowledge we only had one car out of 111 DNF after finish.
My intentions in offering these comments are only meant to be positive and helpful. The last thing I want to do is make you defensive about the great job you are doing for the club, or to dampen your considerable and commendable enthusiasm for designing and managing fun courses and events for us to run, in what is undeniably a deteriorating venue. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. I would suggest, though, that it is difficult if not impossible to make such comments or suggestions before the track is thrown. The only way to gauge the "finer" safety parameters of a track is to drive it at speed. Judging things from a map or drawing can tell you basic things like distances to fixed obstacles, etc., but it is very difficult to tell ahead of actually driving the course with some race pace what the dynamics will be. This is normally only done by the safety chairs right before the event starts, and it is really their responsibility to bring these issues to light. By the time an ordinary competitor like me gets to try the course at speed and make suggestions, it is past the time when you can easily make changes. A tried and true strategy for avoiding these kinds of issues is to put a fairly "kinky" turn right before the finish, and also shortly after the start (so drivers are not tempted to be speed-shifting through second and third gears before entering the first brake zone at 50mph with cold pads). We seem to be trending away from this past practice.Lastly, I say this to all you good forum folks, not in a defensive manner, but so that we are as safe and fun as possible. I send the track to Safety, the CDI Team, and the other AX Guru's before posting it. Then we try to get it posted early for preview, this month was a bit tight. I recieved 0, Zero, None, nada, ziltch, comments on possible issues with the design. If you see something that raises a flag in your minds, Please, please, please, let me know. Change before throwing the track is fairly simple, but gets much more complicated the day of the event, especially if we have to throw the track on Saturday morning.
And if he is anything like I was as a youth, it might seem like this was the ONLY time he ever did what you told him to do...Don Middleton wrote: He was doing just what I told him...

Kim Crosser wrote:said he was trying to avoid flat-spotting his tires by locking up the brakes.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 50 guests