jenniferreinhardt wrote:Just let us girls still have the right to choose. I wouldn't want to be put in the L class or handicapped without my consent.
Aavitt wrote:Honestly, I would not like competing in Ladies Class without a Trophy. There, I said it. Not a surprise to most of you. What can I say, I like Trophy's! Afterall, doesn't perfect attendance count for something, come on? It does in school. Granted that my skill level is improving, after 4 years, 30+ AX's, 4 DE's, 10+ TT's, but seriously, I may be competitive now in AX but not in TT. Our GT3 is TT4 in Zone 7 rules. I know, a new class, no matter what you drive, "Ladies over 50" maybe then I would have a chance! I am opposed to eliminating the Ladies class or keeping it without Trophies. I think that women will not want to join in the fun and may be intimidated at first to even come out and give it a try if they are forced to compete with men. I think we need to keep it a an option.
Aavitt wrote:STANDING UP FOR LADIES CLASS!
Like it or not the "L" class is currently a legitimate part of the Zone 8 rules. Ladies can and should be able to make the choice to add an" L" to their class. I STRONGLY disagree that men and women can compete equally in this sport. Upper body strength and endurance are a major factor especially if you drive a car without power steering. (as I did for 3 years) NOT TO Mention, but I will anyway, a size 13 racing foot that fits easily over the brake and the gas at the same time! Come on? What lady can compete with that? It takes a lot of leg strength to stop a GT3 flying down the straight at 130 mph. I am sorry it is just not a fair fight. Unless the club is willing to hand out Testosterone pills to all the ladies before an event, I think that the Ladies Class should stay an option. I tallied the last 3 years of AX and TT's 07, 08, 09. 21 Ladies competed in Ladies class. 15 trophies were given out in 3 years. ALL of them were WELL-DESERVED, no matter what Katina says. I prefer to compete with other Ladies in my class. It is not my fault that there are no other Ladies in my RSL class at this point in time. There have been others in the GT3 ladies class in the past, unfortunately they are no longer racing with the club. I have classed our GT3 in the Zone 7 system and it comes out AX3. That is up there and a very tough class. What is wrong with AX3L?
ttweed wrote: I think the recruiting effort was limited to those people who had participated in the rules-making process previously, or had shown an interest in it by participating in earlier rule change processes vigorously. In some ways, that makes sense, as it requires a thorough knowledge of the existing rules and their basis, philosophy, interrelationships, etc., as well as a knowledge of Zone 8 dynamics.
TT
I don't see this as a problem, Gary. I don't think being cognizant of the past prevents you from thinking "outside the box." It is easy to be innovative, but it is hard to also be effective without knowledge of what has come before. It isn't fair to imply that there is an "old guard" suppressing change, either. There has never been a charge to a rules committee in recent history to overhaul the club's rules completely, so you really can't judge what experienced people might come up with prematurely. It has never happened yet--there has only been a process established to propose changes to the existing rule set so far. It is only natural that we get a "band-aid/patch" result from the process we currently have. All you can do under it, really, is propose modifications of the existing wording. As I have said, I don't think the current proposal can even be approved within the existing process--it isn't complete enough and conflicts with other provisions of our rules. We would have to either adopt the entire Zone 7 rule set, to maintain consistency and prevent contradictions, or have further related changes proposed and discussed/commented upon before this "classification replacement" effort could continue under our current rules revision process. You cannot expect the rules committee and the region presidents to "fix" the shortcomings or incompleteness of a proposal by "filling in the blanks." That isn't how the established process works. We would need a different approach, outside of the existing rules revision process, to accomplish such a radical change. I think that is what Tom B. was trying to do by organizing a new effort. I think even Greg knows this--he just "threw the grenade into the room" to get people moving in that direction. If it helps get some new volunteers to tackle the problem, maybe it will even do the job in the end.Gary Burch wrote:Maybe this is the problem. How can you have a fresh outlook when you are tied to the past.
As for the Ladies class, I would think a woman that drove a race car would want to beat as many men as she could, as often as she could, and as badly as she could in a class without a suffix.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests