
Cajundaddy wrote:rshon wrote:I think the scaling factor for HP increases due to engine swaps (2.2 times the HP increase) is out of line with the base point scaling:
If one were to take a 375 base point 2007 Cayman (with 245 HP) and do nothing more than replace the engine with a 295 HP Cayman S engine of the same year, the car would take a 110 point hit for engine swap/HP increase (50 x 2.2), making the total 485 points, even though a 2007 Cayman S (with a six-speed, wider wheels, and bigger brakes) only has 445 base points. The base Cayman would have no other advantage that justified a 40 point penalty versus the Cayman S.
It seems the HP upgrade scaling factor is unfair to those who swap an engine (at least in this example). For this example, the scaling factor should be closer to 1.4.
With any new rule system there is bound to be some tuning involved. Just eyeballing the numbers it looks like this version is very tough on HP and tire width, and easy on soft compounds. All the more reason to run dual class this year so the rough edges can be smoothed. Power/weight ratio and grip should be 95% of this game. Everything else is just fluff IMHO. I am not really sure who cares which cams, heads, carbs, injectors, or displacement you got in there. What is the TQ/Wt? Can it be measured by a scrut in the event of a protest?
Martin, that Cay S should be well into GT3 territory on an AX course once you get her sorted. You should be able to give Dan in his old air pumper a run for his money. Don't tell me you are going to let those faded 944s drive around you in that car
Yes the tire points are carried over from our present rules (x10).
The Zone 7 rules have:
25 points for treadwear 100-200
50 points 50-100
100 points <50
Slicks =175
I think that these are more reasonable points for the performance advantage of sticky and stickier tires.
The intent of the rules is that the points for a modification should provide similar performance advantages.
Greg
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests